The National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) has asked Chhattisgarh, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Odisha and Maharashtra to submit a report on the action taken to identify and rehabilitate around 5,000 tribal families displaced from Chhattisgarh due to left-wing extremism. The NCST and the Union Tribal Affairs Ministry had in July 2019 asked these states to conduct a survey to ascertain the number of tribals displaced due to left-wing extremism before December 13, 2005, so that a process could be initiated to rehabilitate them. The states were given three months to complete the survey. In October 2019, the Union Home Ministry also wrote to these state governments to find out how many tribes had been displaced from Chhattisgarh. “We have been told the states could not start the survey due to COVID-19. We issued another notice on January 12 asking them to furnish a report within 30 days,” an NCST official said.
Tribal rights activist Shubhranshu Chaudhary said the Chhattisgarh government created the Salwa Judum in 2005 through mobilising members of local tribes as fighters against the Maoists. The state government trained these fighters in armed struggle and provided them with weapons. They would vandalise the homes and shops of suspected Maoist supporters, while Maoists would kill those suspected of being government informers,” he said. “The SalwaJudum movement drew criticism from human rights observers as people found themselves caught in the crossfire between the two sides. It led to the mass displacement of an estimated 50,000 tribals from Chhattisgarh to neighbouring states,” Chaudhary said.
The Supreme Court had banned the Chhattisgarh government- sponsored vigilante movement in 2011.Tribal rights activists say the tribals, who fled Chhattisgarh due to Maoist violence, are living in 248 settlements in forests of Odisha, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana and Maharashtra. These tribals are living in deplorable conditions without any access to drinking water and electricity. They get lower wages, and most of them do not have ration cards or voter IDs and cannot prove their citizenship. Rights activists claim these states do not recognise them as tribals. They have no rights over forest land and remain excluded from all social security benefits. “The situation of the displaced tribals has worsened during the Covid pandemic. Andhra Pradesh and Telangana have carried out plantations on around half of the land they used for cultivating crops for around 15 years,” he claimed.
Last year, the Chhattisgarh government had told the state assembly that no issue pertaining to the displacement of tribals due to leftwing extremism had come to their notice. Chhattisgarh says no one migrated and Andhra and Telanganaare making renewed efforts to push them back. The Union Home Ministry should rehabilitate them like the Brutribals from Mizoram, Chaudhary said.
According to the Home Ministry, a “large number of minority Bru (Reang) families migrated to North Tripura in 1997-1998 due to ethnic violence in the western part of Mizoram in October 1997. Approximately 30,000 (5,000 families) Bru migrants were given shelter in six relief camps set-up in Kanchanpur district of North Tripura”.In July, 2018, an agreement was signed by the Centre and the governments of Mizoram and Tripura and the Mizoram Bru Displaced People’s Forum for repatriation of 5,407 Bru families comprising 32,876 people residing in temporary camps in Tripura.
According to the ministry’s annual report for the year 2019-20, 328 families comprising 1,369 people will move to Mizoram under the agreement up to November 11, 2019. There has been a sustained demand of Bru families that they may be settled down in Tripura, considering their apprehensions about their security. “Chaudhary said the tribal families displaced from Chhattisgarh can apply for land titles under a “lesser-used” provision in the Forest Rights Act, 2006, which recognises people’s right of settlement in forests and gives them a legal document of ownership of their traditional habitation. Their original villages are in deep jungle, miles away from the main road, and Maoists continue to be a threat there, he said. The displaced tribal families have asked the government to consider their plea for land under the FRA provision for in situ rehabilitation’, wherein alternative land can be given against the one they were forced to leave before 2005.Section 3 (1) (m) of the Act states: “Right to in situ rehabilitation including alternative land in cases where the Scheduled Tribes and other traditional forest dwellers have been illegally evicted or displaced from forest land of any description without receiving their legal entitlement to rehabilitation prior to the 13th day of December 2005.”